The Uniform Cash Providers Act (UMSA), mannequin laws promulgated by the Uniform Regulation Fee and adopted in complete or partly in a number of states, requires a license to “have interaction within the enterprise of cash transmission or promote, solicit, or maintain [one’s self] out as offering cash transmission.”1 A license is also required to do the identical for foreign money alternate, if the foreign money alternate enterprise accounts for “revenues equal or higher than [five percent] of whole revenues” of a enterprise (although a cash transmitter usually wouldn’t have to receive a foreign money alternate license to offer such companies).2 Cash transmission is outlined as “promoting or issuing cost devices, saved worth, or receiving cash or financial worth for transmission.”3 Foreign money alternate means “receipt of revenues from the alternate of cash of 1 authorities for cash of one other authorities.”4 Critically, cash is outlined for functions of the UMSA as “a medium of alternate that’s licensed or adopted by the US or a international authorities.”5 Some states that haven’t adopted the UMSA use comparable language.
By advantage of El Salvador’s adopting Bitcoin as authorized tender, it arguably has turn into a medium of alternate adopted by a international authorities. Underneath a plain-language studying, participating in predicate cash transmitter or foreign money alternate actions with Bitcoin now could fall throughout the scope of each cash transmission and foreign money alternate statutes in any state or territory that has adopted the UMSA definition of “cash.” Thus, the necessities of those legal guidelines might apply even in jurisdictions that haven’t in any other case affirmatively addressed digital foreign money exercise in statute, regulation, or steerage. Accordingly, companies engaged in Bitcoin exercise ought to rigorously consider their enterprise fashions to evaluate whether or not the companies they’re offering would now be thought of cash transmission or foreign money alternate in U.S. jurisdictions by which they function. Sidley has a crew assessing these and different oblique results of the remedy of Bitcoin as authorized tender in El Salvador, together with on securities legal guidelines and tax legal guidelines.
1 Unif. Cash Providers Act § 201(a) (amended 2004).
2 Id. § 401(a); see additionally § 401, cmt. 2.
3 Id. § 102(14).
4 Id. § 102(6).
5 Id. § 102(12).